Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020101 13:24]: > > I'm afraid that doesn't answer my question. > > It's another architecture (like sparc or alpha) which has will however > not be released with woody. They stopped uploading new packages a > while ago and thus package dependencies are broken. Since sh is not a > candidate for woody, you can simply ignore this.
Ah, thanks. Now I understand. Can we prune it from the QA lists? It would make them a better tool, I think.
