Re: Registration to litoo's newsletter

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 01-08-15 Registration to litoo newsletter wrote: > > You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter > > > > Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Which idiot registered this address for this letter and with which > purpose in mind? I would like

Re: Registration to litoo's newsletter

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:19:21PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter > > > > Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Which idiot registered this address for this letter and with which > purpose in mind? I would like to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] being > un

Re: Registration to litoo's newsletter

On 01-08-15 Registration to litoo newsletter wrote: > You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter > > Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which idiot registered this address for this letter and with which purpose in mind? I would like to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] being unsubscribed from this list

Bug#108814: kdebindings_2.2-1(unstable): missing or incorrect build-depends

Package: kdebindings Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious Perhaps you meant python2-dev instead of (or in addition to) python-dev? | Automatic build of kdebindings_2.2-1 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.159 | Build started at 20010814-1628 | **

Unregistration to litoo's newsletter

Dear client, You just unregistered yourself to Litoo's newsletter The given email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are sorry this letter did not give you all the wanted information By the way we hope to see you back soon on our web site Litoo http://www.litoo.com

Processed: merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 108751 108754 Bug#108751: xconv.pl gives the following error "Quantifier follows nothing before HERE mark in regex m/* << HERE * (c) Copyright 1998-2001 by Rob Braun * All rights reserved. The file named COPYRIGHT specifies the terms * and con

Bug#108717: marked as done (qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody and sid)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:53:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#108717: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody and sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Re: Bug#108717: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody and sid

Hi Colin! On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Currently, debcheck only tracks the six architectures we released with > potato, regardless of whether you're looking at stable, testing, or > unstable. It should also track these architectures:

Registration to litoo's newsletter

Cher client, You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This letter will be sent monthly and excepionnaly twice a month You will be aware about litoo's new releases and new events To help us, you can tell your friends to register themselves to our letter

Inscription à la lettre de Litoo

Cher client, Vous venez de vous inscrire à la lettre d'information de Litoo L'adresse électronique communiquée est: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cette lettre vous sera envoyée mensuellement voir deux fois par mois exceptionnellement Elle vous tiendra au courant de nos nouvelles parutions et des déve

Re: new modutils needed to fix 106933

Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > This bug's already two weeks overdue, even given the extended deadline > for fixing RC base bugs, and hasn't seen any progress. I'm sorry, but > if we want to ever release we *need* a working base system, and really > if we want it to be remotely timely, we needed

Re: new modutils needed to fix 106933

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:37:22PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > > Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The > > explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for > > moreinfo. > How nice of you to ask me first and also ig

Re: new modutils needed to fix 106933

Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The > explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for > moreinfo. No, I still need the APUS specific configuration. Wichert. -- ___

Re: new modutils needed to fix 106933

Previously Anthony Towns wrote: > Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The > explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for > moreinfo. How nice of you to ask me first and also ignore other release critical bugs in this request. Wichert. --

Re: fhs transition update

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:20:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > 7. glimpse > > > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > Has a grave security bug fi

Dummy kernel-bin

Hi, Nowadays I tried to install some packages, those required kernel-bin package also. My problem that I don't want to install any kind of kernel related packages (kernel-source,kernel-bin) because I used to compile the kernel from the source with special settings. I would be very happy, if a dum

Re: new modutils needed to fix 106933

On 01-08-15 Anthony Towns wrote: > Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The > explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for > moreinfo. I quite understand that we'll need to get those bugs in the base packages fixed as soon as possible, but instead of c

Bug#25717: marked as done (Weired FAQ-o-matic problem)

Your message dated 15 Aug 2001 06:56:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

new modutils needed to fix 106933

Hi, Could someone please upload a new modutils to fix Bug#106933? The explanation in the report appears to answer Wichert's request for moreinfo. TIA. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferr