Your message dated Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:53:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#108717: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for
woody and sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2001 17:39:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 12:39:31 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mccoy.flatline.org.uk [195.8.181.200] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15WiA6-0003sF-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:39:31 -0500
Received: from cjw44 by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15WiA4-0004Bc-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:39:28 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:39:28 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody and sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Currently, debcheck only tracks the six architectures we released with
potato, regardless of whether you're looking at stable, testing, or
unstable. It should also track these architectures:
woody: hppa ia64
sid: hppa hurd-i386 ia64 mips mipsel s390 sh
I think this is just a case of selecting @ARCHS based on $DIST, but
since I don't know the debcheck code I'm not going to poke around at it.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 108717-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2001 15:37:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 15 10:37:44 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kuolema.infodrom.north.de [217.89.86.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15X2jX-0004RF-00; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:37:44 -0500
Received: from finlandia.infodrom.north.de (finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
[217.89.86.34])
by kuolema.infodrom.north.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 71DE94D78A; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
by finlandia.infodrom.north.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8B1091075E; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:54:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 96F443581D; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by marvin.palfrader.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D75E0386C; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:53:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:53:12 +0200
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#108717: qa.debian.org: debcheck: new architectures for woody
and sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
debian-qa@lists.debian.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-PGP: 1024R/D1A3A329 BB A2 DC FE D7 D2 09 BF 93 46 36 6F C1 A4 41 1A
X-GPG: 1024D/94C09C7F 5B00 C96D 5D54 AEE1 206B AF84 DE7A AF6E 94C0 9C7F
X-Accept-Language: de, en
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Colin!
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently, debcheck only tracks the six architectures we released with
> potato, regardless of whether you're looking at stable, testing, or
> unstable. It should also track these architectures:
>
> woody: hppa ia64
> sid: hppa hurd-i386 ia64 mips mipsel s390 sh
>
> I think this is just a case of selecting @ARCHS based on $DIST, but
> since I don't know the debcheck code I'm not going to poke around at it.
I made the changes. Unfortunatly debcheck now needs an awfull lot of ram
that pandora does not have. It therefore runs on my box and uploads the
results daily.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred. | : :' : By professionals,
| `. `' for professionals
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
