Bug#93696: include command's search path is broken

2001-04-11 Thread Jamie Heilman
Package: chpp Version: 0.3.4-1 >From the documentation: - Command: include FILENAME Includes the file FILENAME. If FILENAME is relative, it is first searched for in the directory of the including file, then in the directories contained in the include search path (*note Invoking

Re: problems compiling arla

2001-04-11 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Steve! You wrote: > No, not a library problem - this is kernel code. At a guess I would say the > module source is for a different kernel version/series than that against > which you are compiling. Well, that's quite weird, since the README explictly says that 2.2 kernels are supported, and I

Re: problems compiling arla

2001-04-11 Thread Steve Dodd
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:09:47AM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > I am trying to bring the arla package up to date. However, I am having > problems getting it compiled. I suspect I am missing some libraries, but > since there are no build-deps, I don't know which one(s). Does anyone > maybe have an

Bug#40498: marked as done (gtoaster_0.19990624-1(unstable): build error (root-owned dir))

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:36:47 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#93064: marked as done (pnm2ppa; pnm2ppa has finished with Segmentation fault.)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#92674: marked as done (build-depends on obsolete package)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#91606: marked as done (Package otp still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#91594: marked as done (Package nasm-mode still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#91026: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#91019: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#90298: marked as done (Extraneous menu file)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#90383: marked as done (Strange messages)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#90053: marked as done ('Uninitialized value' warnings from apt-listchanges (and Newt, too))

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#89696: marked as done (needs upsate for rpm 4)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:31:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#89231: marked as done (missing build-dep for flex)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#86319: marked as done (xmotd uses /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#84542: marked as done (failed to build from source)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#80679: marked as done (outdated perl dependency)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#70823: marked as done (wrong permissions)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#66312: marked as done (Crash in "Other options" (when sizeof(int) != sizeof(long)))

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#65230: marked as done (Please remove obsolete README.debian)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#64414: marked as done (rpm2html: no shared library librpm.so.1.0, current is librpm.so.0.0.0)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#62902: marked as done (otp build fails on mips/mipsel)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#61330: marked as done (build fails on mipsel)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#59963: marked as done (libnewt-perl: incorrect man page docs)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#56722: marked as done (ircd-dalnet: ircd-dalnet postinst tries to modify init script links for ssh and start it)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#89945: marked as done (NMU fixes -- diff)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:13:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no need for nmu diffs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#52336: marked as done (mgt: depends on ncurses3.4 which is in oldlibs)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:15:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#30736: marked as done (NMU diffs)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:13:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no need for nmu diffs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#22886: marked as done (mgt: nonmaintainer upload diffs)

2001-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:14:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line no need for nmu diffs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#93626: interactive configuration process

2001-04-11 Thread Joey Hess
Package: ircd-dalnet Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-10 Severity: normal The package is interactive at build time, and asks a ton of non-obvious questions. This makes it essentually unmaintainable by debian-qa, unless we have a dalnet ircd expert on the team I'm not aware of.. -- System Informatio

Bug#93625: bashism

2001-04-11 Thread Joey Hess
Package: ircd-dalnet Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-10 Severity: normal The build process uses . rather than source in Config, which is a bashism -- System Information Debian Release: unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kite 2.4.3 #1 Tue Apr 3 20:44:00 PDT 2001 i686