Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing nmu fixed bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2001 01:21:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 17 19:21:36 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hse-kitchener-ppp229394.sympatico.ca (pisces.woot.net) 
[64.230.141.83] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14eRt2-0007g0-00; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:21:36 -0600
Received: from hosehead by pisces.woot.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14eRnp-0004z5-00; Sat, 17 Mar 2001 20:16:13 -0500
From: Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'Uninitialized value' warnings from apt-listchanges (and Newt, too)
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 20:16:13 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 1.40
Severity: normal

Whenever apt-listchanges runs, I get the following warning at the top of the
screen:

Use of uninitialized value in length at /usr/bin/apt-listchanges line 602.

as well as the following after it exits:

Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at blib/lib/Newt.pm (autosplit 
into blib/lib/auto/Newt/Form/DESTROY.al) line 526 during global destruction.
        (in cleanup) form is not of type newtComponent at blib/lib/Newt.pm 
(autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Newt/Form/DESTROY.al) line 526 during global 
destruction.

I don't know if this is a problem with newt or apt-listchanges, or my system.
It doesn't seem to harm apt-listchanges' functionality, though.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pisces 2.4.0 #2 Tue Jan 9 15:14:05 EST 2001 i686

Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on:
ii  apt                           0.5.3      Advanced front-end for dpkg       
ii  debconf                       0.9.25     Debian configuration management sy
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl        1.01-10    Using libc functions for internati
ii  perl                          5.6.0-21   Larry Wall's Practical Extracting 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 90053-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2001 06:25:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 01:25:11 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [198.144.200.155] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14nE3w-0000Vb-00; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:25:08 -0500
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
        id 928D0BC020; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:25:07 -0700
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing nmu fixed bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

These bugs were fixed in past uploads of the respective packages, which
are all "maintained" by the Debian QA Group.

-- 
see shy jo

Reply via email to