Re: Your help with QA is needed

2001-03-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010331 18:48]: > How are you defining "base"? The contents of the base section do not > match the base system as installed by the boot floppies. At the moment, I used the rule: (($priority =~ /(important|required)/) || $essential) I wi

Re: Your help with QA is needed

2001-03-31 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > - Help fix bugs in the base. Currently, the base has over 1500 > bugs, including 23 RC bugs. Please send in patches through > the BTS. See http://qa.debian.org/base-bugs.html for a full list. > Since base is going to be frozen before the rest of the system

Your help with QA is needed

2001-03-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I added some stuff to the QA web site. Those people who always said that QA's tasks are not well defined can stop complaining. There's plenty of work listed on the web site now: - Help fix bugs in the base. Currently, the base has over 1500 bugs, including 23 RC bugs. Please send in patch

Processed: Fixed in NMU of fonter 1.7-6

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 84575 + fixed Bug#84575: failed to build from source Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kdevelop 1:1.4.0-3.1

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 92190 + fixed Bug#92190: kdevelop; Build-Depends: flex, qt-doc Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Fixed in NMU of swish-e 2.0.5-1

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 78060 + fixed Bug#78060: swish-e: the package is greatly obsolete Tags added: fixed > tag 91055 + fixed Bug#91055: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man Tags added: fixed > tag 91669 + fixed Bug#91669: Package swish-e still has at lea

fonter_1.7-6_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: fonter_1.7-6.dsc to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-6.dsc fonter_1.7-6.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-6.diff.gz fonter_1.7-6_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fonter/fonter_1.7-6_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to severity fixed: 84575 I

Fixed in NMU of fonter 1.7-6

2001-03-31 Thread Debian QA Group
tag 84575 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:14:25 +0200 Source: fonter Binary: fonter Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.7-6 Distrib

swish-e_2.0.5-1_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: swish-e_2.0.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/swish-e/swish-e_2.0.5-1_i386.deb swish-e_2.0.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/swish-e/swish-e_2.0.5-1.diff.gz swish-e_2.0.5-1.dsc to pool/main/s/swish-e/swish-e_2.0.5-1.dsc swish-e_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/swish-e/swish-e_2.0.5.orig.tar

Fixed in NMU of swish-e 2.0.5-1

2001-03-31 Thread Debian QA Group
tag 78060 + fixed tag 91055 + fixed tag 91669 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 06:17:31 +0200 Source: swish-e Binary: swish-e Architectu

installing debian

2001-03-31 Thread Taysir Soliman
I am a new user of debian linux I am trying to install it on my machine I downloaded it from the internet what should I do next ? Is there a place I can got to on the internet I could not find this on the manual. Taysir SolimanGet Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Bug#90052: marked as done (List todo/done status when using -list/-show (w/diff))

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#91341: marked as done (error while loading shared libraries)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#86649: marked as done (dependency problem)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#76022: marked as done (latin1-cars mangled in ical)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#55491: marked as done (`ical -print' doesn't work)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#51378: marked as done (ical: [wishlist] checked TODO items should be moved to the bottom of the item list)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#51281: marked as done (ical: ical shouldn't keep empty items)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#51269: marked as done (ical: wish for reminder window close some time after specified event occurs)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:49:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ical removed from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#92297: Kdevelop crashes right after start

2001-03-31 Thread Daniel Frank
Package: kdevelop Version: 1.4.0-3 After I start kdevelop from the kde2 desktop, i see three windows: KDevelop main window, a window titled "KDevelop failed to shutdown correctly previously" and a window telling me that KDevelop got the signal SIGSEGV. I'm using the latest unstable packages availa

Bug#85224: marked as done (New version of pnm2ppa is available.)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:56:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in pnm2ppa 1.04-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#33503: marked as done (xxgdb_1.12-9.2(frozen): dh_installxaw now executable)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:48:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#26802: marked as done (xxgdb unusable)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:38:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#9417: marked as done (xxgdb: Segmentation violation)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:38:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#32207: marked as done (xxgdb: xxgdb doesn't work at all.)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:38:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#21664: marked as done (xxgdb: debian/rules clean target incomplete)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:42:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#14470: marked as done (/usr/doc/$(PACKAGE)/copyright should not be compressed)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:42:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#60993: marked as done ((no subject))

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:32:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#60993: (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#86339: marked as done (xxgdb uses /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:09:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#86028: marked as done (xxgdb: violates app-defaults policy)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:09:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#85819: marked as done (xxgdb: xxgdb crashes immediately when started)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:09:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in xxgdb 1.12-9.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#67948: marked as done (needs recompile to fix xpm4g dependancy)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:50:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#67948: needs recompile to fix xpm4g dependancy has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: xtron is orphaned; closing bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 84657 Bug#84657: xtron: incorrect build dependency Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 86337 Bug#86337: xtron uses /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAI

Bug#90252: marked as done (xxgdb_1.12-9.4(unstable): error in build dependencies)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:42:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#89700: marked as done (xxgdb messes up xaw wrappers)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:40:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#80069: marked as done (xxgdb: please add menu hints)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:45:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#43563: marked as done (xxgdb: icon not found by window-managers)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:44:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#37114: marked as done (xxgdb: xaw-wrappers registration method has changed)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:40:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#34950: marked as done (xxgdb: missing pixmap)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:44:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xxgdb 1.12-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#30635: marked as done (missing link)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:35:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xtron 1.1a-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#46327: marked as done (xtron: manual page is incorrectly formatted [PATCH])

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:32:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xtron 1.1a-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#43832: marked as done (manpage for xtron missing .SH NAME section)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:32:59 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in xtron 1.1a-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#91755: marked as done (knews_1.0b.1-4(unstable): non-executable script during building)

2001-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:31:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in knews 1.0b.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#92190: kdevelop; Build-Depends: flex, qt-doc

2001-03-31 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
I'll get this fixed. On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:16:21AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Package: kdevelop > Version: 1:1.4.0-3 > Severity: serious > > Without flex installed, configure doesn't even finish. The configure > script also seems to search for the QT documentation, and compile the > pr