Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up

I'm going to NMU some orphaned packages soon to fix up their FHS status and set their maintainer to QA if necessary. In particular, if no-one else has done them already, I'll do bezerk, bridge, echo-linux, freefont, nasm-mode, python-pmw, sharefont, swish-e, tcl8.0-ja, tk8.0-ja, and type1inst. I w

Processed: Merging #86649 and #91341

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 86649 91341 Bug#86649: dependency problem Bug#91341: error while loading shared libraries Merged 86649 91341. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Bug#91341: error while loading shared libraries

Package: ical Version: 2.2-9 Severity: normal [02:33:14 /tmp]$ ical & [1] 15492 [02:34:29 /tmp]$ [1]+ Stopped ical [02:34:30 /tmp]$ fg ical ical: error while loading shared libraries: libtcl8.3.so: cannot load shared object file: No such file or directory [02:34:32 /tmp]$ --

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xtron 1.1a-7

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 86337 + fixed Bug#86337: xtron uses /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

xtron_1.1a-7_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: xtron_1.1a-7.dsc to pool/main/x/xtron/xtron_1.1a-7.dsc xtron_1.1a-7_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xtron/xtron_1.1a-7_i386.deb xtron_1.1a-7.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xtron/xtron_1.1a-7.diff.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to severity fixed: 86337 If t

Fixed in NMU of xtron 1.1a-7

tag 86337 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:28:15 -0800 Source: xtron Binary: xtron Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1a

filters-nonfree_2.5_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: filters-nonfree_2.5.dsc to pool/non-free/f/filters-nonfree/filters-nonfree_2.5.dsc filters-nonfree_2.5.tar.gz to pool/non-free/f/filters-nonfree/filters-nonfree_2.5.tar.gz filters-nonfree_2.5_i386.deb to pool/non-free/f/filters-nonfree/filters-nonfree_2.5_i386.deb Announcing to d

Processed: Bug#89109: fmirror: the new timezone detection doesn't work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 89109 + moreinfo Bug#89109: fmirror: the new timezone detection doesn't work Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#89109: fmirror: the new timezone detection doesn't work

tags 89109 + moreinfo thanks > Package: fmirror > Version: 1:0.8.4final-0.1 > Severity: grave > > The timezone detection in the new version doesn't work anymore. > This causes constant regets of whole archives if one is using > a cluster of ftp servers in different timezones. > > This makes it f

Bug#70219: marked as done (automatic build fails for potato)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:31:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in 0.3.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#65780: marked as done (chpp not installable)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:30:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in chpp 0.3.4-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#44329: marked as done (this package is not native)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:10:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#44329: this package is not native has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#89194: marked as done (dotfile-doc useless)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:38:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in dotfile-doc 20010324-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#67560: marked as done (Dotfile Generator can't read byte-compiled files.)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:04:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in dotfile 1:2.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#62109: marked as done (dotfile should conflict with dotfile-emacs)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:02:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in dotfile 1:2.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#46197: marked as done (A few updates to mserver)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:15:21 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in mserver 0.23a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#38363: marked as done (patch for chpp to support mysql properly)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:36:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#38363: patch for chpp to support mysql properly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#30498: marked as done (mserver bug (fwd))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:13:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in mserver 0.23a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#18655: marked as done (mserver: /etc/init.d/mserver does not comply with Policy 3.6 Console messages)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:11:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in mserver 0.23a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#14852: marked as done (mserver has suspicious copyright file)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:09:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in mserver 0.23a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#11945: marked as done (long desc contains typos)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:07:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in mserver 0.23a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Processed: chpp 0.3.5-1 is in the archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 33246 Bug#33246: new upstreadm Bug closed, send any further explanations to Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 87344 Bug#87344: chpp: NMU 0.3.4-1.1 Bug closed, send any further explanations to Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of mes

Bug#91012: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2001 09:36:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#91012: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is