On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:49:45PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Eric VB wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I entered the NM queue 6 months ago. I then posted an ITA to adopt the
> > package
> > 'crafty'.
> >
> > My ITA isn't reported on the crafty's bugs list page th
Hi Marcelo!
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > [NEW] 3dchess (#87154), orphaned today
> > Current maintainer: [something not Debian QA]
>
> Can someone here please take care of this? Allow some reasonable
> timeframe (I'd say no more t
[Gah, wrong To header, sorry Marcelo]
- Forwarded message from Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 23, 2001
To: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 19:49:53 +0100
Mes
hi
I have found your e-mails (and the email of the debian-qa group)
inside the latest packaging of "xmorph"
I am coauthor of "xmorph"
I am a mantainer, and I think I may adopt "xmorph" and package it
I have already sent an e-mail to Arocha, that
was considering to adopt "xmorph"
asap the pack
Package: hylafax-server
Version: 4.0.2-14
Severity: important
It seems the hylafax packages are unmaintained. Most bug-reports are over
2 years old.
If hylafax-server only works with sysklogd, and not with syslog-ng, it
should conflict with syslog-ng, because:
# apt-get install hylafax-server
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:33:08PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:55:43PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > So, I'm going to apply for maintainer status, but it looks like I need an
> > > advocate to verify my application. Any volunteers?
> >
> > I would certainly welcome pe
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:55:43PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > So, I'm going to apply for maintainer status, but it looks like I need an
> > advocate to verify my application. Any volunteers?
>
> I would certainly welcome people to apply to the NM process, or to
> help debian in any other way t
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > In ALL cases, discretion should be used. The goal is not to
> >
> > What do you mean with "discretion should be used"??? I always thought
> > Debian was an open project and that "We Won't Hide Problems"?
>
> Just to clarify this further, I now realize
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:51:45AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> > In ALL cases, discretion should be used. The goal is not to
>
> What do you mean with "discretion should be used"??? I always thought
> Debian was an open project and that "We Won't Hide Prob
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:51:45AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
>
> >...
> > > It's either that or ask for an override, which means that when and if
> > > the package gets adopted you have to ask for a change again, which puts
> > > more work on the should
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
>...
> > It's either that or ask for an override, which means that when and if
> > the package gets adopted you have to ask for a change again, which puts
> > more work on the shoulders of ftp admins. I rather put more work on
> > the shoulders of a mac
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> this is what people are seeing, which means bug reports go to those
> maintainers and not to -qa, which happens to add yet another point to
> my seemingly ethernal problem with orphaned packages. THEY ARE NOT
> MAINTAINED.
>...
Orphaned packa
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:57:22AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Upload new packages of everything just to change the maintainer to
> > QA ?
> >
> > seems like a waste of resources, especially with the buildd's on
> > some arch's behind
>> Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Upload new packages of everything just to change the maintainer to
> QA ?
>
> seems like a waste of resources, especially with the buildd's on
> some arch's behind a lot, adding even a little more load doesnt make
> sense.
Since I take this inf
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:55:21AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > [NEW] 3dchess (#87154), orphaned today
> > Current maintainer: [something not Debian QA]
>
> Can someone here please take care of this? Allow some reasonable
> timeframe (I'd say no
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [NEW] 3dchess (#87154), orphaned today
> Current maintainer: [something not Debian QA]
Can someone here please take care of this? Allow some reasonable
timeframe (I'd say no more than 28 days and preferably less), but
otherwise all these packages should h
On Thursday 22 February 2001, at 15 h 6,
the keyboard of Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. REDISTRIBUTION
>
>This software may not be redistributed without prior
>written permission from BB4 Technologies Inc.
>
> So, someone would have to ask them.
I got this written au
17 matches
Mail list logo
