Bug#80804: `pgpk -a' does not work with stdin

2000-12-28 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
Package: pgp5i Version: 5.0-6 Severity: normal According to pgpk(1), `pgpk -a' with no keyfile specified reads from stdin. In fact, this is not the case: % pgpk -a -a argument requires a key file or URL to add to your keyring.Error! Unable to load string PGPERR_MISSING_ARGUMENT. A

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 19:32, Joey Hess wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I propose to stop the current NM process and to reorganize it. > > "... let's do the time warp a-gain!". > > (Ok, so I'm behind on email, but this is giving me cold sweats.) Don't worry. The current NM process is (almos

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-28 Thread Joey Hess
Adrian Bunk wrote: > I propose to stop the current NM process and to reorganize it. "... let's do the time warp a-gain!". (Ok, so I'm behind on email, but this is giving me cold sweats.) -- see shy jo

Re: Brian Bassett?

2000-12-28 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Martin Michlmayr wrote: > to contact Brian as well. I'm posting to debian-devel now to ask if > anyone knows what's up with Brian. He is alive, He uploaded a package on Dec 3, and his last message to debian-devel was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Nov 4. Big brother is watching you :)

Brian Bassett?

2000-12-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001219 01:30]: > I have tried to talk to Brian Bassett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly > several times by email. The first email was sent at least 2 months > ago. The second was sent over than 1 month ago and since I have > sent the third about a week has passed

Bug#80573: marked as done (should replace grafix)

2000-12-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:54:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#80573: fixed in grafix 1.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

sciplot_1.36-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

2000-12-28 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: sciplot_1.36-5.dsc to pool/main/s/sciplot/sciplot_1.36-5.dsc sciplot1_1.36-5_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sciplot/sciplot1_1.36-5_i386.deb sciplot_1.36-5.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sciplot/sciplot_1.36-5.diff.gz sciplot-dev_1.36-5_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sciplot/sciplot-dev_1.36-5_i386.

grafix_1.6-2_i386.changes INSTALLED

2000-12-28 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: grafix-dev_1.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix-dev_1.6-2_i386.deb grafix1_1.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix1_1.6-2_i386.deb grafix_1.6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6.orig.tar.gz grafix_1.6-2.dsc to pool/main/g/grafix/grafix_1.6-2.dsc grafix_1.6-2

Re: Old bugs cleaning

2000-12-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:38:22PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > 2.- Send email to every bug-sender with a text like this: > > Don't do this. You ought to at least have a look at the bug report > before sending e-mail to people. I'd get annoied if I got a bunch of > mail about bugs that could eit

Processed: retitles for empty subject field

2000-12-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 80746 man pages in wrong directory Bug#80746: (no subject) Changed Bug title. > retitle 80747 man pages in wrong directory Bug#80747: (no subject) Changed Bug title. > retitle 80748 man pages in wrong directory Bug#80748: (no subject) Changed

Bug#80774: (no subject)

2000-12-28 Thread Chad Miller
Package: update Severity: serious The FHS requires that man pages be installed under /usr/share/man . mime-support: /usr/man/man8/update-mime.8.gz update: /usr/man/man8/update.8.gz

Bug#80767: (no subject)

2000-12-28 Thread Chad Miller
Package: saml Severity: serious The FHS requires that man pages be installed under /usr/share/man . saml: /usr/man/man3/saml.3.gz

Re: Old bugs cleaning

2000-12-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 05:05:03PM +, Luis Arocha -data- wrote: > 2.- Send email to every bug-sender with a text like this: Don't do this. You ought to at least have a look at the bug report before sending e-mail to people. I'd get annoied if I got a bunch of mail about bugs that could eith

Re: Old bugs cleaning

2000-12-28 Thread Chuan-kai Lin
Luis Arocha -data- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I stated this is only a draft and I have more questions than answers: >- Must this emails saved in the BTS? I think that would be a good idea to send the message through the [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias, so that both the BTS and the original submit

Bug#80704: outdated perl dependency

2000-12-28 Thread Joey Hess
Package: libset-object-perl Version: current in unstable as of 28-dec-00 [ This bug report was automatically generated. If it is in error, close it. ] libset-object-perl depends on a version of perl prior to perl-5.6; either perl-5.004, perl-5.004-base, perl-5.005, or perl-5.005-base. Perl 5.6 i