On Sunday 03 December 2000 22:48, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I think the NM team would appreciate it if you could put together a
> team of volunteers who are willing to sponsor NMs. You could send
> e-mail to all those NMs who have not been assigned an AM yet (a
> listing is available at http://nm.
* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 18:48]:
> If you want to discuss this, then go ahead, but flaming doesn't
> help.
I think the NM team would appreciate it if you could put together a
team of volunteers who are willing to sponsor NMs. You could send
e-mail to all t
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> > debian packages and fixing other bug packages. You can't only look at
> > the bug reports of people and judge them. You also should take a look at
> > how much th
On 00-12-03 Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> As a matter of fact he emphasised several times that I should take my time
> to do my job properly and was very serious about the quality of debian
> packages. He proved to be competent in all the aspects of packaging and
> 'debianness' we encountered so far. H
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> > Well, I think that there are enough people to sponsor NMs. I currently
> > fail to see that we are missing enough sponsors.
> If there are so many sponsors, why haven
* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> debian packages and fixing other bug packages. You can't only look at
> the bug reports of people and judge them. You also should take a look at
> how much they contributed already to debian.
You won't believe
* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 17:39]:
> Well, I think that there are enough people to sponsor NMs. I currently
> fail to see that we are missing enough sponsors.
If there are so many sponsors, why haven't you done the most obvious
thing in the world: the list of
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 14:24]:
> > > The Build-Depends: I didn't count but I guess about 80 - 90% get
> >
> > Also I wonder how you can guess that the number is so high? I think
> > it would be
On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:01:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
> Hmm. You misunderstanding me a littlebit.
On 00-12-04 Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:24:29PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > documented well at all). And I have them fix it. There are packages
> >
> > And that should be the part that the sponsor should do. We have the
> > concept of sponsorship for new maintainers,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:18:23AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Yes we need new maintainers and this thread is about making it
> more cumbersome and difficult to become one.
I can't understand why not make it harder. I agree with
nm.debian.org's TODO List[1] ('More checks before AM approves'). De
This mail is intended to create some sort of opposing viewpoint and I would like
to lay out my personal experiense concerning Marin as a AM.
I got appointed Martin as a AM, and he always was friendly and helpfull.
As a matter of fact he emphasised several times that I should take my time
to do m
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:24:29PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > documented well at all). And I have them fix it. There are packages
>
> And that should be the part that the sponsor should do. We have the
> concept of sponsorship for new maintainers, so that they have a debian
No, we do not.
* Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 14:24]:
> > The Build-Depends: I didn't count but I guess about 80 - 90% get
>
> Also I wonder how you can guess that the number is so high? I think
> it would be only about 10-20& judging from looking at the bug
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:01:24PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
Hmm. You misunderstanding me a littlebit. I want the same thing like
you, I just d
I would suggest setting up some standards that apply to all developers and
appoint someone to see that those standards are applied.
If you have a developer who does no signifigant work during a half year or 3
month basis, put him on probation. If the work isn't being done, put the
developer on pro
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 00:01]:
> > When I see that a package with missing build dependencies (except
> > debhelper) that has in debian/copyright a "Copyright: not yet known"
> > and 2 other bugs is
Package: stringlist
Version: 0.3-3
The config.sub script is out of date, making ARM builds impossible. Please
update it to the latest version from subversions.gnu.org.
--- Configuring
./configure --prefix=/usr
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/insta
Hi to all the readers of this mail,
On 00-12-03 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >...
> > > do either use the high standards I want to use for my applicants and they
> > > see that others with lower skills are already accepted by other AMs or
> > > when I do suggest
On 00-12-03 Lenart Janos wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
> > Well, I can tell you, that if I see some really lazy Developers in the
> > future, I will complaining about them, even on -devel if it's needed. As
On 00-12-03 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 13:11]:
> > Martin is only "an AM", but...
> I forgot to mention one thing: I think I'm the AM who asks the _most_
> questions about Philosophy & Procedures. I think this a
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 13:11]:
> Martin is only "an AM", but...
I forgot to mention one thing: I think I'm the AM who asks the _most_
questions about Philosophy & Procedures. I think this area is in
particular important because then I see if th
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 00:01]:
> After the discussion where James and Martin totally disagreed with
> me
I do NOT totally disagree with you. (I made that clear when you
approached me.)
> When I see that a package with missing build dependencies (except
> d
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001203 13:11]:
> Martin is only "an AM", but he has already processed 42 applicants
> (more than 25% of all processed applicants) and if he continues with
> his speed
I have processed 33 since 9 'on hold' people are part of
[ Please CC to me, or to debian-newmaint-admin ]
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:17:37AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko wrote:
> Well, I can tell you, that if I see some really lazy Developers in the
> future, I will complaining about them, even on -devel if it's ne
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Christian, hi Dale,
>...
> > do either use the high standards I want to use for my applicants and they
> > see that others with lower skills are already accepted by other AMs or
> > when I do suggest that they should become members of Debian bef
Hi,
sorry to intercept here. I'm not subscribed to debian-newmaint-admin but
to debian-qa, so please send a copy of your answer to this mailing-list.
Thanks.
On 00-12-03 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [Cc to debian-qa because this mail explains why I'll quit Debian QA]
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Gergely Risko
Package: xmap-smotif
Now free..
- Forwarded message from Remco Treffkorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Remco Treffkorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 01:21:05 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mayko xmap...
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686)
is no m
28 matches
Mail list logo
