Bug#52439: marked as done (dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?))

1999-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:16:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#52439: dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#52439: dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?)

1999-12-21 Thread Larry Lade
Installed version 1.3-1. Works properly when bytecompiled. :-)

patch for mailx

1999-12-21 Thread Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler
merge 26757 40424 thanks Hi, the patch should correct bugs #26757 and #40424 against mailx (mail -u user doesn't work). The bug is related to an undocumented "feature" of mailx: mailx makes use of the environment variable "MAIL", if it is set (should be set on any Debian system). The patc

Re: bugsquash NMU of base-files

1999-12-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ah, I was confusing the install announcements with the upload announcements. I found it. > > Do you intend to incorporate the changes I made in my NMU

Re: bugsquash NMU of base-files

1999-12-21 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:52:30PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > You might check debian-devel-changes for uploads from me too :-) > > No upload announcement for base-files was made from you. If there was I > didn't receive it; perhaps you could se

Re: bugsquash NMU of base-files

1999-12-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:52:30PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > It is ok to NMU a package because of having an important bug, but please > > > follow the guidelines in developer