Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:16:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#52439: dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 1999 11:06:52 +0000
Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 10 Dec 1999 11:06:51 -0000
Received: from volta.midco.net (24.220.1.10)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 1999 11:06:51 -0000
Received: from host-80-30.bismarck.midco.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [24.220.30.80])
        by volta.midco.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id FAA05163
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 05:06:25 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by host-80-30.bismarck.midco.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id 
FAA00495;
        Fri, 10 Dec 1999 05:06:24 -0600
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 05:06:24 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Larry Lade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7

Package: dotfile-procmail
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: grave

GUI portion of program does not even appear. Spits out long error. Other 
modules of dotfile work properly

Output of stderr:

Error in startup script: invalid command name "-\"
    while executing
"-\\"
    invoked from within
"set __changeFunc(recipes) "
    if \{\$changeElm == \"filter_sigDir\"\} \{
      set com_filter_sigDir \$filter_sigDir
    \}
  

    if \{\$changeElm..."
    (file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english/procmail/bytecompile" line 34)
    invoked from within
"source /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english/procmail/bytecompile"
    ("uplevel" body line 1)
    invoked from within
"uplevel \#0 source [lindex $argv 1]/bytecompile"
    (procedure "byteCompile?" line 36)
    invoked from within
"byteCompile?"
    invoked from within
"set __bc [byteCompile?]"
    (file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/Generator/dotfile.tcl" line 121)



-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux lovecraft 2.2.13 #1 Mon Nov 29 01:27:51 CST 1999 i586 
unknown

Versions of the packages dotfile-procmail depends on:
ii  dotfile         2.3b2-2        Easy configuration of popular programs throu
ii  tcl8.0          8.0.5-4        The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8.0 - Run-T
ii  tcl8.0          8.0.5-4        The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8.0 - Run-T
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package tclsh)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 52439-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 1999 13:22:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 26492 invoked from network); 21 Dec 1999 13:22:20 -0000
Received: from jagor.srce.hr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 1999 13:22:20 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id OAA00197;
        Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:16:43 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:16:43 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Larry Lade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#52439: dotfile-procmail: Doesn't work at all (tcl error?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Larry Lade on Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 
04:49:33AM -0600

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 04:49:33AM -0600, Larry Lade wrote:
> Installed version 1.3-1. Works properly when bytecompiled. :-)

So it was the paths/versions issue after all. Good.

Thanks for reporting.

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

Reply via email to