Re: Bug#33218: #33218: rpc.bootparamd broken - parses comments as hostnames

1999-10-10 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 04:50:22PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Because I'm yet to reach bootparamd while splitting netstd. It will > be fixed when it leaves netstd. Why can't the included patch be included before then? Are you willing to accept an NMU? Mike Stone pgpOKWWvFtdDO.pgp Description:

Bug#45418: marked as done (lesstifg .dhelp missplaced)

1999-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:30:17 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line .dhelp file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Processed: typo

1999-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 32617 Bug#32617: balsa: Needs to be recompiled Bug reopened, originator not changed. > close 32167 Bug#32167: Nedit crashes probably because of lesstif Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! > quit Stopping processing here

Bug#41356: marked as done (lesstifg-dev: should depend on xlib6g-dev)

1999-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:27:13 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line not needed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#39417: marked as done (mwm menus are broken)

1999-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:16:54 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mwm-menumethod can't be that smart has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#19493: marked as done (xmgr with lesstif doesn't work well)

1999-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:09:14 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.86.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Re: Bug#33218: #33218: rpc.bootparamd broken - parses comments as hostnames

1999-10-10 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 08:42:27AM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote: > > > rpc.bootparamd doesn't understand /etc/bootparams files with > > comment lines in them. The default /etc/bootparams has comment > > lines. rpc.bootparamd tries to interpret the # character as a > > hostname. >

#33218: rpc.bootparamd broken - parses comments as hostnames

1999-10-10 Thread Andreas Voegele
> rpc.bootparamd doesn't understand /etc/bootparams files with > comment lines in them. The default /etc/bootparams has comment > lines. rpc.bootparamd tries to interpret the # character as a > hostname. Why hasn't this bug been fixed? It was reported 240 days ago and it took me