Hi,
i've updated my script that generated the list of buggy packages, it
does now generate HTML tables listing 'source package' sorted by
different criteria :
- score = number of bugs + number of lintian errors + age of the
oldest bug / 30
- number of bugs
- age of the oldest bug
You can find
Anthony Towns wrote:
>Package: fdutils
>Maintainer: Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>7893 fdformat causes my floppy parameters to be lost
>[REMOVED?] fdformat is rumoured to have been removed from fdutils?
>8352 fdutils: Major problems with fdutils
Yes, it's removed and here'
Package: ispell
Version: 3.1.20-0.6
Ispell uses either the termio or the sgtty interface to operate terminal
modes. The GNU libc encourages use of termios in favour of termio.
Because of backwards compatibility, there are problems associated with the
obsolete termio interface. For example, on L
Package: ibritish
Version: 3.1.20-0.6
The ibritish dictionary systematically accepts American spellings, but may
reject British ones.
For example, when checking the following file:
color colour theatre theater catalog catalogue kerb curb organisation
organization licence license defence defense,
Hi!
On Tue, 30 Mar at 21:07 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> You can mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or straight to James Troup
> at [EMAIL PROTECTED], and check what is happening. And please, be polite.
Thanks. I've sent out a mail.
> > I also find the rivival of QA a nice thing and like to participate al
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 March 1999, at 0 h 24, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quite easy. Many upstream maintainers aren't aware that some Debian
> > people picked up their package and worked on them.
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 07:41:06PM +, Mika Fischer wrote:
> I've been accepted as maintainer on 14.03.99
> Is it normal, that including the key takes so long?
> Is there anything I can do to speed it up?
> I'd really like to upload something in the end :-)
You can mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>Package: lynx
>Maintainer: Christian Hudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>3846 lynx misdisplays multiple in
>[HELP] Is this really a bug?
RFC 1866 (HTML 2.0) says:
The content of a element is a sequence of elements and/o
Hi!
On Wed, 31 Mar at 00:14 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Package: ispell
> Maintainer: Debian QA Group
> 5379 munchlist ignores -w
> 8585 ispell: ispell does not understand amslatex constructs
I'd like to adopt ispell if noone has already.
Or are there any problems with that.
Most of the bugs
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * Michael Dorman's packages that were affected, namely mailtools,
> xpm4.7 and mhonarc no longer have *any* open bugs!
I'd like a porter to recompile xpm source (which produces xpm4g,
xpm4g-dev and xpm4.7), so that we can v
Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> Package: modutils
> Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 8550 kerneld start too late
This bug is obsoleted by 2.2 kernels. I'll close it when 2.2 becomes the
default kernel.
Wichert.
--
=
Hello again world,
I posted this list around the start of this month, so I guess it's about
time for an update.
For those who didn't see it last time, it's a list of non-wishlist,
unfixed bugs that are 24 months old or more. Obviously, these aren't as
high a priority as the release-critical bug
Hi Folks,
I took a look at Anthonys oldbugs.txt
(http://master.debian.org/~ajt/oldbugs.txt) and decided to have a go at
tkman. Expect a new upload sometime this week. It might happen that I
don't have the time this week and I am on vacation next week but thereafter
I will have something ready I
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > It would be a proper action to write to -devel that package x, y and z
> > > need a new maintainer and people who are interested should speak up.
> >
> > Yes, but by someone in position and who has every right to do so.
> > I wo
On Tuesday 30 March 1999, at 0 h 24, the keyboard of Martin Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite easy. Many upstream maintainers aren't aware that some Debian
> people picked up their package and worked on them.
As a rule, I *always* ask for permission of upstream authors. Even when the
15 matches
Mail list logo