Docu about Salsa workflow

2022-12-21 Thread c . buhtz
Hello, sorry for asking. I'm looking or the right document explaining the workflows on Salsa. Am I on the right way here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonTeam ? Most projects on Salsa do have three branch names. I need an explanation of them and how they interact. Kind Christian

Re: Docu about Salsa workflow

2022-12-21 Thread Scott Talbert
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: Hello, sorry for asking. I'm looking or the right document explaining the workflows on Salsa. Am I on the right way here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonTeam ? Most projects on Salsa do have three branch names. I need an explanation of them

Re: review for pytest-fail-slow/0.3.0-1

2022-12-21 Thread Ileana Dumitrescu
Hi, Some repo issues: * It appears tags were not pushed, as there's no tags at all in the repo - not even for the imported upstream release - although the typical gbp workflow would handle that. That is done now. * The upstream tarball produced by uscan differs from the pristine-tar

Bug#1026825: python3.11 as default

2022-12-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org Please setup a transition window for python 3.11 as the default python3 version. A tracker is setup at https://release.debian.org/transitio

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-21 Thread Matthias Klose
while we have not an 100% agreement to go ahead, I think we should aim for 3.11. The following steps would be: - accept the current python3-defaults into testing (adding 3.11 as supported) - ask for a transition slot to upload (see #1026825) python3-defaults with 3.11 as the default - s

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
thoughts from a concerned maintainer On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:24 PM Matthias Klose wrote: > > while we have not an 100% agreement to go ahead, I think we should aim for > 3.11. > > The following steps would be: > > - accept the current python3-defaults into > testing (adding 3.11 as suppo

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-21 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Sandro Tosi writes: > thoughts from a concerned maintainer > Sandro, thank you for writing this email. > > it seems this email advocates for a "let's wing it"[1] type of transition. > > [1] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wing_it > > It appears there has been little work in preparing the work to

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-21 Thread M. Zhou
There is not yet an accurate estimate of time required to fix the python packages during the transition -- and I still remember the transition from python3.9 -> python3.10 took a very long period that does not seem short enough to be covered by the freeze schedule. Apart from that, package maintai