Hi Ben,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:07:01PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I was just thinking a link might be useful for folks landing on the
> > LibraryStyleGuide page, but I don't feel strongly about it.
>
> I have written https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack>,
> do you think that is
Thanks for the feedback folks. I'm not sure it's going to be feasible to
collapse the non-Debian changelog entries - there have been a lot of uploads
to Ubuntu in the meantime. I don't know what I'm going to do yet, but it
seems like it's at least acceptable to leave them in or trim them. At lea
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:07:01PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I have written https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack>,
> > do you think that is worth linking to (perhaps if I put it at a
> > different Wiki page) from the Python library style guide?
>
> Can you
Hi Ben,
> I think adding a field to ‘debian/copyright’ for that purpose is a bad
> idea, so I am unlikely to incorporate that functionality into the
> document.
I'm sure you are aware that policy §12.5 requires the details of where
upstream sources were obtained from; that is commonly interpret
Stuart Prescott writes:
> In the current copyright-format/1.0, people are including repackaging
> information with a Comment field, as an explanatory text to the Source
> field or with some other ad hoc field name.
By my reading of ‘copyright-format/1.0’ (the “Machine-readable
debian/copyright f
5 matches
Mail list logo
