Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> I don't think forming a separate team would be silly at all.
I agree with absolutely all of what Ansgar wrote about this.
What is important is people doing the work, and being able to find
advices. In other words: team work.
> When you say "I want to maintain my packag
We[0] have a Python application, which includes Python modules that are
not supposed to be used by any other software. Some of them are
extension modules. What is the best way to package such applications? I
can think of the following approaches:
A) Install the modules to dist-packages. This i
On 16 February 2013 09:10, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It would be really stupid to only want to "claim" to be working as part
> of the team, that's not at all what I want to do. I'd like to be able to
> help when I can, and receive help when I need, which is the point of a
> team.
>
I agree there a
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Oh! Are you *sure* this is what you think of me? It's quite shocking to
> read that. It's not that at all. It's:
It's what I think are the practical consequences of what you propose.
> team)! Well, if I'm not allowed to use Git within the
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 16 February 2013 09:10, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > It would be really stupid to only want to "claim" to be working as part
> > of the team, that's not at all what I want to do. I'd like to be able to
> > help when I can, and rece
* Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packages may only be
maintained in SVN.
B - As A, but encourage the creation o
* Cornelius Kölbel , 2013-02-14, 16:53:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/qrcode
Link to .dsc for the lazy:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrcode/qrcode_2.4.2-1.dsc (2.4.2-1)
Please drop the preinst script. It's purpose was to clean up after
python-central in lenny. But this pa
On 16 February 2013 18:10, Simon Chopin wrote:
> Hello Joseph,
>
> Quoting Joseph Tate (2013-01-30 05:27:08)
>> I've updated the version of pytest to the latest upstream. It doesn't need
>> to be backported, I would just like to see the version in raring be updated.
>>
>> *** /tmp/tmpKV7SC6/bug_
On 02/16/2013 08:36 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> But this is exactly the point; if team members are doing work in SVN,
> then your packages in Git are not benefitting from this work.
Let's be practical for a bit.
Some members of the team already said they like to use Git.
So we wont have everyo
On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
>>
>> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>>>
>>> The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
>>>
>>> A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packages may
On Saturday 16 February 2013 20:29:07 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> A, F.1 - Migrate to Mercurial, if and only if mercurial queues are
> fully functional and are used to maintain the debian/patches
> sub-repository.
>
> realisticly i am opposed to a mix of version control systems.
>
> someone to do t
On 17 February 2013 08:29, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
>>>
>>> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
On 16 February 2013 21:35, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 17 February 2013 08:29, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>>> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>
> The following fo
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 10:35:01 AM Robert Collins wrote:
> On 17 February 2013 08:29, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> > On 16 February 2013 14:27, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
> >>> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> The follow
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 03:27:08PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-02-16, 09:10:
> >On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> >>The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
> >>
> >>A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packa
On Feb 16, 2013, at 05:10 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>3) Upstream uses Git, and I have already lots of git things inside my
>package and workflow (I already explained, I have no choice at all),
>plus I know there's others willing to use Git, and not having the
>possibility to do team work with them
On Feb 16, 2013, at 05:51 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>You'd also have to get some consensus around full source or debian directory
>only branches. I don't think we can split on that either.
Agreed!
>Personally, I've found nothing but frustration from trying to manage both
>Debian packaging and
17 matches
Mail list logo
