* Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com>, 2013-02-16, 09:10:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:43:02 PM Thomas Kluyver wrote:
The following four positions have all been advocated in this thread:
A - Maintain the status quo, in which DPMT packages may only be
maintained in SVN.
B - As A, but encourage the creation of a separate team where Python
modules can be maintained in git.
C - Allow DPMT-maintained packages to live in SVN or git, so new
packages can be committed to git if the packager prefers. Optionally,
we could make provisions to migrate existing packages.
D - Migrate all the DPMT-maintained packages to git.
(I suggest we don't consider other VCSs - while we might have our
favourites, I sampled the list of Debian teams, and found very few
using anything other than svn or git. So tools & workflows for other
VCSs are likely to be less well developed.)
So I would vote CDBA, in order of preference.
E - Migrated to bzr, but I want someone else to to all the work.
EA
F - Migrate to Mercurial, but I want someone else to do all the work.
AF
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130216142708.ga9...@jwilk.net
