On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I believe there's some misunderstanding, so I must make it square.
> Again, I'm *not* asking for a full switch (or any switch at all) of all
> (or even some) packages of the python module team. I have *NEVER*
> written such thing, so could
On 02/15/2013 05:21 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I believe there's some misunderstanding, so I must make it square.
>> Again, I'm *not* asking for a full switch (or any switch at all) of all
>> (or even some) packages of the python module
On 02/15/2013 01:39, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> I don't think forming a separate team would be silly at all. If you
> have a group of people working on Python packages in Git, and a
> separate group of people working on Python packages in SVN, what use
> is there in pretending that they're the same
Hi Robert & Jelmer,
I would like to upload a new upstream version of python-testtools. I
have worked out some changes in the packaging, which I have attached to
this message.
Do you agree with such NMU?
Can I also upload this package in the python module team SVN repository,
instead of collab-ma
On 16 February 2013 01:52, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Robert & Jelmer,
>
> I would like to upload a new upstream version of python-testtools. I
> have worked out some changes in the packaging, which I have attached to
> this message.
>
> Do you agree with such NMU?
Yes, thank you.
> Can I also u
On 02/16/2013 06:09 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 16 February 2013 01:52, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi Robert & Jelmer,
>>
>> I would like to upload a new upstream version of python-testtools. I
>> have worked out some changes in the packaging, which I have attached to
>> this message.
>>
>> Do yo
6 matches
Mail list logo
