On 02/15/2013 05:21 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: >> I believe there's some misunderstanding, so I must make it square. >> Again, I'm *not* asking for a full switch (or any switch at all) of all >> (or even some) packages of the python module team. I have *NEVER* >> written such thing, so could anyone writing in this tread refrain from >> switching to this topic? If you do want to talk about it (which would be >> a great move, IMO), do it in another thread, or at least not as a reply >> to my message. > > I'm speaking about the same thing as you are. Having some packages is > SVN and some in Git (it's what you mean) will make it harder to do > mass-commits, mass-search and keeping up with others' changes. > > Again, I prefer Git to SVN, but I agree with Barry, Scott and others > that divergence is *not* what we want. > > -- > Dmitry Shachnev
So, should I open a new Alioth group for maintaining Python modules collectively using Git? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/511e1718.4010...@debian.org
