Re: Bug#651962: Fwd: Bug#651962: python-argparse redundant?

2011-12-17 Thread Julian Taylor
On 12/14/2011 05:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:07 +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: >> About #651962, I guess that something like '<< 2.7' should be added to >> X-Python-Version... > > Yes, if python-argparse can be used by versions earlier that 2.7, but is > incom

Re: Bug#651962: Fwd: Bug#651962: python-argparse redundant?

2011-12-17 Thread Julian Taylor
On 12/17/2011 04:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On 12/17/2011 04:32 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >> On 12/14/2011 05:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:07 +0900, Arnaud >>> Fontaine wrote: About #651962, I guess that something like '<< 2.7' should be

Re: Bug#651962: Fwd: Bug#651962: python-argparse redundant?

2011-12-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 04:32:04 PM Julian Taylor wrote: > On 12/14/2011 05:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:07 +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > >> About #651962, I guess that something like '<< 2.7' should be added > >> to > >> X-Python-Version... > > >

Re: Bug#651962: Fwd: Bug#651962: python-argparse redundant?

2011-12-17 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 17, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >The presumption behind the recommendation is that argparse provided as part >of 2.7 makes python-argparse redundant/obsolete. I'm guessing from your >comment that's not true? It makes it largely unnecessary, but not incompatible (afaik). -Ba

Re: Bug#651962: Fwd: Bug#651962: python-argparse redundant?

2011-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 12/17/2011 04:49 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: On 12/17/2011 04:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On 12/17/2011 04:32 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: On 12/14/2011 05:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:07 +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: About #651962, I guess that s