On Saturday, December 17, 2011 04:32:04 PM Julian Taylor wrote: > On 12/14/2011 05:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:07 +0900, Arnaud Fontaine <ar...@debian.org> wrote: > >> About #651962, I guess that something like '<< 2.7' should be added > >> to > >> X-Python-Version... > > > > Yes, if python-argparse can be used by versions earlier that 2.7, but is > > incompatible with 2.7 or later, then the dependencies definitely need to > > reflect that. Thanks. > > > > jamie. > > in what way is it incompatible with 2.7? > I have been using it since always with 2.7 and never had any issues > (besides some pkg-resources warnings one can ignore) > > The change of python-argparse to 2.6 only now pulls the 2.6 interpreter > for every package depending on it for optional 2.6 support (like ipython) > > I'd prefer it to have the dependency of argparse reverted to 2.6 | 2.7 > instead of having to split my packages or ship embedded argparse.
The presumption behind the recommendation is that argparse provided as part of 2.7 makes python-argparse redundant/obsolete. I'm guessing from your comment that's not true? Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2167612.6NVsPprRkU@scott-latitude-e6320
