Re: Switching to git

2011-03-18 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 03/06/2011 11:46 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > moreover, while talking about tags, in GIT some symbols we use for > debian versioning (e.g. ~ and :) are not allowed in tags, so they get > replaced (with '%' and '.' for above with git-buildpackage). That is > the only kind of cons I see in sw

XB-Python-Version in the policy

2011-03-18 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
Hi The wiki page at http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PyCentral2DhPython2 tells you to remove the XB-Python-Version lines in debian/control but the python policy still says they are required in section 2.3. I presume this is outdated in the policy? If so any reason why this isn't updated? Regards F

Re: XB-Python-Version in the policy

2011-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Floris Bruynooghe wrote: Hi The wiki page at http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PyCentral2DhPython2 tells you to remove the XB-Python-Version lines in debian/control but the python policy still says they are required in section 2.3. I presume this is outdated in the policy? If so any reason why thi

Re: XB-Python-Version in the policy

2011-03-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Floris, On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 22:42, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > Hi > > The wiki page at http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PyCentral2DhPython2 > tells you to remove the XB-Python-Version lines in debian/control but > the python policy still says they are required in section 2.3.  I > presume this

Re: RFS: pycxx (updated package) + feedback wanted

2011-03-18 Thread Julian Taylor
On 09/03/11 20:10, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 03/06/2011 06:48 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 6.2.0-6 >> of my package "pycxx". >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> python-cxx - A Set of facilities to extend Python with C++ >> pyth

Python Policy Updates

2011-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Today's mail on XB-Python-Version motivates me to send out an overdue call for inputs on further changes to the Python policy. I know that needs to go. What else needs doing? Personally I'd like to concentrate on getting policy for Python 3 to the point that it's possible to produce a correct

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 18, 2011 10:23:05 pm Scott Kitterman wrote: > Today's mail on XB-Python-Version motivates me to send out an overdue call > for inputs on further changes to the Python policy. I know that needs to > go. > > What else needs doing? > > Personally I'd like to concentrate on getting