On Friday, March 18, 2011 10:23:05 pm Scott Kitterman wrote: > Today's mail on XB-Python-Version motivates me to send out an overdue call > for inputs on further changes to the Python policy. I know that needs to > go. > > What else needs doing? > > Personally I'd like to concentrate on getting policy for Python 3 to the > point that it's possible to produce a correct module or extension package > based on what's in the policy without explicitly requiring a helper of any > kind. I think dh_python3 is the right helper to have and it's good to use > it, but I think policy should fully describe what someone needs to do. > I'd particularly appreciate inputs from everyone on this topic. > > Thanks, > > Scott K
I went through and did a bit of clarification plus added more Python 3 specifics. I don't think it will be controversial. You can find the proposed diff here: http://alioth.debian.org/scm/loggerhead/pkg-python/python-defaults- debian/revision/200 Comments welcome/encouraged, plus additional changes. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103182352.50329.deb...@kitterman.com
