Re: RFS: python-pyftpdlib

2010-06-21 Thread Janos Guljas
Hi, Thank you for taking a look on this package and for your help. I've committed changes to svn. I hope that this is good now. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Umang Varma wrote: > I'm not very experienced, so somethings in this mail may be factually > *wrong*. Please correct anything in this m

Re: RFS: dnspython (NMU, updated package, new upstream release)

2010-06-21 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.0-0.1 > of package "dnspython". Robert Edmonds already uploaded a new version for this package yesterday, so please ignore this RFS. Thanks. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secu

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 20, 2010, at 04:28 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> I'm going to declare rough consensus around this approach and I'll have a >> Python policy patch for review shortly. I haven't had time to read this through yet, but I recently posted some information related to Python on Debian and Ubuntu a

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2010-06-21] > I haven't had time to read this through yet, but I recently posted some > information related to Python on Debian and Ubuntu and requested off-list > feedback. One of the more interesting messages I got was from someone who was > trying to install a package that has be

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, June 21, 2010 05:40:37 pm Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jun 20, 2010, at 04:28 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> I'm going to declare rough consensus around this approach and I'll have > >> a Python policy patch for review shortly. > > I haven't had time to read this through yet, but I recentl

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 21, 2010, at 06:30 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >I think most people install Python modules and extensions as dependencies of >applications they care to use. For Python developers that actually care >about such things, I think it's better that the just install both manually. I agree about t

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >[Barry Warsaw, 2010-06-21] >> I haven't had time to read this through yet, but I recently posted some >> information related to Python on Debian and Ubuntu and requested off-list >> feedback. One of the more interesting messages I got was from

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Barry Warsaw" wrote: >On Jun 21, 2010, at 06:30 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>I think most people install Python modules and extensions as dependencies of >>applications they care to use. For Python developers that actually care >>about such things, I think it's better that the just install

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > If we maintain a standard that if in Python you import foo, then the Python > package name is python-foo and the Python3 package is names python3-foo, I > would think this is manageable.  I think that adding this metapackage would > impose