On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> If we maintain a standard that if in Python you import foo, then the Python > package name is python-foo and the Python3 package is names python3-foo, I > would think this is manageable. I think that adding this metapackage would > impose a lot of complexity on packagers and/or python helper maintainers, > bloat the Packages.gz file signficantly, and probably provide confusing search > results. What is the point of separate python-foo/python2-foo and python3-foo packages? Will they be separate source packages or just binary packages? Will we rename the python3-foo packages to python-foo once python 2 is gone? After python 2 is gone will we add new packages named python-foo and have old python3-bar packages in the archive at the same time? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
