Re: lintian troubles and .changes doubts

2009-09-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Alessandro Dentella (03/09/2009): >> Hi, > > Hello, > >> I'm trying to produce the python-sqlkit package. I'm both the upsteam >> author and the mantainer. I have /debian folder in original package. I >> recently read is not recommended but I found easier to manage

Re: lintian troubles and .changes doubts

2009-09-03 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Bernd Zeimetz, 2009-09-03] > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Alessandro Dentella (03/09/2009): > >> I'm trying to produce the python-sqlkit package. I'm both the upsteam > >> author and the mantainer. I have /debian folder in original package. I > >> recently read is not recommended but I found

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#543351: logilab.astng cannot be imported after upgrade from stable

2009-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Chris, thanks for your report. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 14:43, Chris Lamb wrote: > Package: python-logilab-astng > Severity: serious > Version: 0.19.0-2 > ... > I can make it work by manually removing > >  /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/logilab Since all the packages sharing logilab namespace

Re: lintian troubles ... almost done

2009-09-03 Thread Alessandro Dentella
thanks to anybody for the answers. > > I forced > > it an now lintian complains: > > > >san...@bluff:/misc/src/hg/py$ lintian python-sqlkit_0.8.6_all.deb > >W: python-sqlkit: latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-version > > > >What should I do? > > When you use -v, you have

Re: lintian troubles ... almost done

2009-09-03 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/9/3 Alessandro Dentella : >> > bad-distribution-in-changes-file >> > >> > >> >   If I run lintian on .changes it complains >> >   "bad-distribution-in-changes-file" but I'm unsure on what I should do. >> >   At present I'm building on an ubuntu-hardy so the nam

Menu entries not appearing

2009-09-03 Thread Alessandro Dentella
Hi, I tried to add a menu entry for application 'sqledit', but the entry does not appear if I use standard menu entry in debian as: ?package(python-sqlkit):needs="X11" section="Applications/Office"\ title="sqledit" command="/usr/bin/sqledit" it gets placed in /usr/share/menu/python-sqlki

Re: Menu entries not appearing

2009-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Please use debian-mentors for general questions. follow up there On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 13:42, Alessandro Dentella wrote: > Hi, > >  I tried to add a menu entry for application 'sqledit', but the entry does not >  appear if I use standard menu entry in debian as: > > ?package(python-sqlkit):needs=

Re: lintian troubles ... almost done

2009-09-03 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Dmitrijs Ledkovs, 2009-09-03] > I have no clue about the js file bit though. Remove it (via patch) and > symlink it from the shipped package by debian? That is my wild guess. > Or maybe contact sphinx maintainer in Debian. I hope there is an > option to symlink it. http://lists.debian.org/debian-

Re: lintian troubles ... almost done

2009-09-03 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
(Please reply to list as well thanks) 2009/9/3 Alessandro Dentella : >> > Last question >> > - >> > >> > When testing creating the package from my newly created sources on a newer >> > machine (ubuntu 9.04), lintian complained: >> > >> > W: python-sqlkit: embedded-javascript-library >>

RFS: wtop (python-app)

2009-09-03 Thread Mauro Lizaur
Hello people, I'd like to know if any of you could sponsor/take a look at this top-like app which parses Apache's log to analyze the stats of a server. BTW, I've chosen 'experimental' as the distribution for this package basically because when I was testing this package I had little or no signif

Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

2009-09-03 Thread Luca Falavigna
Timur Birsh ha scritto: > > debian/control: > > * You probably miss a dependency on transmission. > > I think Suggests dependency on transmission-daemon is a better choice? Is module useful without transmission-daemon (or transmission)? I think it should be put into Recommends at least. Some ot

Re: RFS: transmissionrpc (fixed)

2009-09-03 Thread Timur Birsh
Luca Falavigna wrote: > Is module useful without transmission-daemon (or transmission)? I think > it should be put into Recommends at least. OK. I've put it into Recommends. > Some other issues: > > * Upstream tarball is packed in a strange way. I use > uscan --force-download --repack doepr