Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 16:49 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > Please, don't use the python2.X-foo scheme for such a small package. You
> > only need a single python-foo package, built against the default python
> > version. It eases transitions a lot, and avoids unnecessary cluttering
> > the a
Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 18:20 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> I suggest (a bit out of the blue, in no way yet endorsed by anyone) have
> two source packages;
>
> pythonX.Y-foo (where X.Y is really "X.Y", not "2.3") that generates the
> multiple binary packages python2.2-foo, python2.3-foo, pytho
Special Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an iss
Many people either dont have time for, or dont want a relationship. Thats where
we come in. Take a look at our database of members to find just the type of lay
that you want. Listings are worldwide. Get some tonight.
http://saohe.hellimnone.com/wmld/fbs/
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 04:11, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 18:20 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > I suggest (a bit out of the blue, in no way yet endorsed by anyone) have
> > two source packages;
> >
> > pythonX.Y-foo (where X.Y is really "X.Y", not "2.3") that generates the
5 matches
Mail list logo
