Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 18:20 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit : > I suggest (a bit out of the blue, in no way yet endorsed by anyone) have > two source packages; > > pythonX.Y-foo (where X.Y is really "X.Y", not "2.3") that generates the > multiple binary packages python2.2-foo, python2.3-foo, python2.4-foo, > etc. It should build depend on each corresponding python2.2-dev, > python2.3-dev, python2.4-dev etc. > > python-foo, which generates the single dummy binary package python-foo > with the appropriate dependencies to tie it to the current default > python.
This is complete overkill. Which problems would it actually solve? For most python packages, a single source and binary should be enough. No more. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
