Re: [zope] 2.5.1 for woody

2003-06-14 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:48:37AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: > Hi, [...] > here's my buglist: [...] All these bug are probably caused by the patch i produced which reverted the changes already done on z2.py and other files. New package is available. thanks, -- Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis

Re: [zope] 2.5.1 for woody

2003-06-14 Thread Marcus Schopen
Hi Luca, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote: On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:48:37AM +0200, Marcus Schopen wrote: Hi, [...] here's my buglist: [...] All these bug are probably caused by the patch i produced which reverted the changes already done on z2.py and other files. New package is available. 1)

Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
I've managed to get python-apt (and thus apt-listchanges) working again on my testing system. What a PITA... Anyway, I first just tried to recompile python-apt-0.5.4.3. Compile went fine, but the first attempt to execute apt-listchanges failed with a dynamic linking error. C++ API change. First,

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:11:56AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > I've managed to get python-apt (and thus apt-listchanges) working again > on my testing system. What a PITA... > > Anyway, I first just tried to recompile python-apt-0.5.4.3. Compile went > fine, but the first attempt to execu

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:40:12AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:11:56AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > > I've managed to get python-apt (and thus apt-listchanges) working again > > on my testing system. What a P

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:28:30PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:40:12AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > If you had wanted to find out the answer before sending this to > > debian-devel, you would not have had to look very far. > > bugs.debian.org/python-apt has th

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Saturday, Jun 14, 2003, at 01:40 US/Eastern, Matt Zimmerman wrote: If you had wanted to find out the answer before sending this to debian-devel, you would not have had to look very far. bugs.debian.org/python-apt has the answer three times over. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:46:51PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > My two questions were: > 1) Why did dpkg-buildpackage wind up compiling with the wrong > compiler? Isn't there a C++ transition plan that should > prevent that. I think it using the most current one, whic

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:46:51PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Saturday, Jun 14, 2003, at 01:40 US/Eastern, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > >If you had wanted to find out the answer before sending this to > >debian-devel, you would not have had to look very far. > >bugs.debian.org/python-apt

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:45:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > According to 2.4.2, the package should build correctly. It did. However, > it didn't run because you had an incompatible version of apt installed. The > dependency system does not have a facility to handle this situation. Well, o

Re: Fun with python-apt

2003-06-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 01:05:37AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:45:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > According to 2.4.2, the package should build correctly. It did. > > However, it didn't run because you had an incompatible version of apt > > installed. The depe