Re: task-python, proper dependencies in other python packages

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:55:19PM -0500, Joe Block wrote: > David Coe wrote: > > > > > I do think task-python(*) makes sense. But I think a "python" package > > > would just encourage people to make gratuitous overarching > > > dependencies... > > > > Another good point. > > Part of the proble

task-python, proper dependencies in other python packages

David Coe wrote: > > > I do think task-python(*) makes sense. But I think a "python" package > > would just encourage people to make gratuitous overarching > > dependencies... > > Another good point. Part of the problem is that there doesn't seem to be a tool yet to automatically figure out whi