David Coe wrote: > > > I do think task-python(*) makes sense. But I think a "python" package > > would just encourage people to make gratuitous overarching > > dependencies... > > Another good point.
Part of the problem is that there doesn't seem to be a tool yet to automatically figure out which files your program is importing from, and what packages provide them. > task-python-bundle have the entire upstream (www.python.org) distribution > (I'm not sure I like the name '-bundle' -- if you have a better suggestion > please speak up.) task-python-standard or task-python-distribution? jpb -- Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CREOL System Administrator Social graces are the packet headers of everyday life.
