On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 21:00 -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
> Hi Diane,
>
> Thank you for working on this.
>
> Do you have LLVM team write access? If so please help your self and
> directly push the commits there. If not, please open a merge request
> and I'll process it quickly.
>
I don't have llvm team
On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 20:58 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hello,
>
> Has a bug been filed against llvmlite? If not, shouldn't there be
> one?
So it's not clear if there is a bug here.
The problem is the llvmlite upstream is currently release is targeting
llvm-15, which debian removed for b
Hi Diane,
Thank you for working on this.
Do you have LLVM team write access? If so please help your self and
directly push the commits there. If not, please open a merge request
and I'll process it quickly.
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 22:59 -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a version of llvm
Hi Diane!
Diane Trout writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a version of llvmlite that builds against llvm-19 with 2 test
> failures that don't look to important. One of them is definitely just
> the layout of the object file changed from what was expected.
>
> I got most of the help in the comments in here:
Hi,
I have a version of llvmlite that builds against llvm-19 with 2 test
failures that don't look to important. One of them is definitely just
the layout of the object file changed from what was expected.
I got most of the help in the comments in here:
https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/1092
>> No idea. I'm keeping an eye on upstream release but the only option
>> I can see to make it work is to depend on the LLVM version that does
>> not exist in unstable.
>
> I found some time and energy to rebase the 1092 llvm-19 compatibility
> branch against 0.44.0
> https://github.com/detrout/ll
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 14:08 +0100, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> >
>
> some news ?
>
> friendly ping :))
I was waiting to see if I could get some advice from upstream.
I added a bit more to the upstream bug about what's different between
llvm 15 and 19 for one of the failing test.
https:/
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 13:41 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:50 -0800, Diane Trout wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any ideas of what could be done to help get a version
> > of
> > llvmlite that works with numba into Debian?
>
> No idea. I'm keeping an eye on upstream release but the on
On 2025-02-18 20:39:05 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.02.25 19:41, M. Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:50 -0800, Diane Trout wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have any ideas of what could be done to help get a version of
> > > llvmlite that works with numba into Debian?
> >
> > No idea. I'm
On 18.02.25 19:41, M. Zhou wrote:
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:50 -0800, Diane Trout wrote:
Do you have any ideas of what could be done to help get a version of
llvmlite that works with numba into Debian?
No idea. I'm keeping an eye on upstream release but the only option
I can see to make it wor
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:50 -0800, Diane Trout wrote:
>
> Do you have any ideas of what could be done to help get a version of
> llvmlite that works with numba into Debian?
No idea. I'm keeping an eye on upstream release but the only option
I can see to make it work is to depend on the LLVM versi
Hello,
llvmlite barely managed to be updated to llvm-15, and then llvm-15 was
removed from Debian.
There's a bit of work on llvmlite to support llvm19
https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/1092
but it looks like it doesn't work yet.
Unfortunately for a number of python tools, numba can't be ins
12 matches
Mail list logo
