Hi Diane, Thank you for working on this.
Do you have LLVM team write access? If so please help your self and directly push the commits there. If not, please open a merge request and I'll process it quickly. On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 22:59 -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > Hi, > > I have a version of llvmlite that builds against llvm-19 with 2 test > failures that don't look to important. One of them is definitely just > the layout of the object file changed from what was expected. > > I got most of the help in the comments in here: > https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/1092 > > Additionally with some other patches I was able to get numba to build > with this version of llvmlite and with numpy 2.2 and all it's tests > passed on x86_64. It also got through some tests on arm64 before it > timed out. > > I pushed all my changes to llvmlite to > https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite > at commit 17e84a9243ba92a9248e7415c84a980e0ff96886 > > The important bit is this patch from upstream > https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite/-/blob/master/debian/patches/llvm-19-support-pr1182.patch?ref_type=heads > And this patch skips/expects the two failed tests > https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite/-/blob/master/debian/patches/skip-llvm-19-broken-tests.patch?ref_type=heads > > I also pushed all my changes to numba for it to build with the above > version of llvmlite and numpy 2.2 > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba.git > > (numba should work, though I had to merge a small change to the tests > that I forgot to push to salsa a while ago, and it's building again, > but I'm tired and it'll take a while to run through all the tests > again) > > I hope it's still not too late to get numba back in to testing. > > Diane
