At some point, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++),
>
> I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this:
>
> > assuming there aren't any critical bugs.
>
> is one of the questions I want an anwser to here.
>
> Personally I've neve
> I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++),
I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this:
> assuming there aren't any critical bugs.
is one of the questions I want an anwser to here.
Personally I've never even installed python2.1 so I have no idea
about it's stability
Matthias Klose wrote:
Ron writes:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
If you think that two separate wxgtk
versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing
packages for a new version.
Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will
Ron writes:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > If you think that two separate wxgtk
> > versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing
> > packages for a new version.
>
> Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will
> n
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> If you think that two separate wxgtk
> versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing
> packages for a new version.
Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will
not consider having *both*
Hello,
the wxgtk maintainer asked me to foreward the following questions to this list:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 11:31:09 2001
>
> What I'd really like to know is that (by far)
> most of the people currently using it with 1.5 will be happy that
> it is now built with 2.1
In my opinion a
6 matches
Mail list logo
