At some point, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++), > > I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this: > > > assuming there aren't any critical bugs. > > is one of the questions I want an anwser to here. > > Personally I've never even installed python2.1 so I have no idea > about it's stability. What I'm interested in figuring out is which > version we should be concerned with getting into Woody.
Well, 2.1 isn't the latest version (2.2a4 is, with 2.2b1 coming soon). I had a one problem with crashing in 2.1, but that was fixed in 2.1.1. I would say 2.1.1 is even more stable than 1.5.2. Can anyone think of any reason why 2.0 should stay? (Besides packages depending on it.) I mean, is there any difference between 2.1 and 2.0 that would be difficult to fix when upgrading a package to depend on 2.1 instead of 2.0? (I can't) -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke |[EMAIL PROTECTED]