On 10/21/2014 06:18 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I you generate a orig.tar.xz by yourself, then you can (or have to if it is
> the
> packaging team's requirement) register it with the command “pristine-tar
> ”. Since it is not much work, I thing that it
> is fair to ask people to do it even if pe
Hi,
Charles Plessy:
> Pristine-tar is much about preparing a package update while not having access
> to the Debian archive at the same time. Two' invokations of git-archive will
> not necessary generate byte-identical tarballs.
Two invocations of pristine-tar will not, either, if you happen to
Le Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:42:56AM +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>
> So, just generating the orig.tar.xz from upstream Git tag, in practice,
> does the same thing as pristine-tar, except that you *know* you have to
> take past orig.tar.xz from the Debian archive, always, instead of
> discovering
On 10/13/2014 06:14 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> In practice, I haven't seen any problems with pristine-tar. And given that
> archive uploads still currently require a tarball, and PyPI releases are
> overwhelmingly tarball-based, I think it still makes sense for DPMT to
> continue to use pristine-ta
On Oct 14, 2014, at 07:57 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Ah sorry, it was a message from Henrique de Moraes Holschuh.
>
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/08/msg00694.html
Thanks, Henrique's posting does make sense. :/
-Barry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.de
Le Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:40:00AM -0400, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
>
> I search d-d on gmane and wasn't able to find Joey's specific message about
> pristine-tar bitrot. pristine-tar does have a few bugs that could be
> relevant. I'm not sure where that leaves us though.
Ah sorry, it was a messag
Hi Charles, thanks for the information.
On Oct 13, 2014, at 08:41 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>in the Debian Med team, we had concrete evidence last May that the
>pristine-tar data bitrots with time in the way explained by Joey on
>debian-devel.
>
>Sorry to not have a high-quality summary to propos
Le Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:14:19PM -0400, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:27 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>
> >That's interesting, I didn't know about that. I'm not really sure I
> >understand how dgit replaces pristine-tar, unless you assume that
> >every tarball you want to store
On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:27 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>That's interesting, I didn't know about that. I'm not really sure I
>understand how dgit replaces pristine-tar, unless you assume that
>every tarball you want to store is in the archive. (Perhaps that's a
>reasonable assumption?) And since we
n-pristine-tar-packaging/
This doesn't load for me at the moment (database error). Okay, found
it in Google's cache; unfortunately the post doesn't say much beyond
"I'm going to stop using pristine-tar".
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
--
To UNSUBS
On 2014-10-12 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Let's say there's a few more other people which
> were not accounted for and that were not at Debconf, those who prefers
> having upstream source code in the VCS are still the majority.
And some weren't at Debconf and prefer to work with upstream
source
11 matches
Mail list logo
