On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:27 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: >That's interesting, I didn't know about that. I'm not really sure I >understand how dgit replaces pristine-tar, unless you assume that >every tarball you want to store is in the archive. (Perhaps that's a >reasonable assumption?) And since we are not planning to use dgit in >DPMT (as I understand it), I'm not sure what the obvious way for us to >replace pristine-tar is.
In practice, I haven't seen any problems with pristine-tar. And given that archive uploads still currently require a tarball, and PyPI releases are overwhelmingly tarball-based, I think it still makes sense for DPMT to continue to use pristine-tar workflows by default. Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141012181419.6f734...@anarchist.wooz.org
