On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:07:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> long time ago, stackless was distributed as a patch to python. is this
> still the case?
They provide full tarballs on the site. what is important to know is
wether it can live in a separate tree for his own files, and use the
com
Ethan Glasser-Camp writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless
> being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this
> question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some
> research about the compatibility between Sta
t. If it's
able to use the same module path for the extensions, and its own path
for its own private things, that should just work withoug duplicating
all the work.
now one has to take care of that, I don't know if anyone that has
packaging skills is interested into packaging stackle
Hi guys,
I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless
being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this
question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some
research about the compatibility between Stackless and vanilla
CPython. I went to t
From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Stackless Python?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:56:26 -0500
> Has this been packaged? Are there any plans to do so?
I'd very much like to see stackless packaged with the latest and greatest
microthreads module.
the down side is that t
Has this been packaged? Are there any plans to do so?
-- John
6 matches
Mail list logo
