Ethan Glasser-Camp writes: > Hi guys, > > I asked on #debian-python a few days ago about the odds of Stackless > being packaged. MadCoder, speaking unofficially, told me that this > question would be better to ask on this list, and suggested I do some > research about the compatibility between Stackless and vanilla > CPython. I went to the Stackless mailing list and asked some questions > and I think the answer is: "If Stackless isn't binary compatible, it > is considered a bug in Stackless." > > Here is the thread I started: > > http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/2006-August/001876.html > > .pyc files should be compatible (compiler and interpreter are not > changed by Stackless). > > Stackless is 100% compatible with pure Python code. > > There has been an occurrence of a C extension (PyQT) not being binary > compatible, but this is a rare case, and the Stackless people are > interested in resolving the bug if it can be reproduced.
long time ago, stackless was distributed as a patch to python. is this still the case? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
