Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-23 Thread Tomás Di Domenico
Sorry for the late reply, and thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. On 15/11/12 09:01, Andreas Tille wrote: > If Jakub wrote *ideally* than he most probably intended to write that we > should try to do so but there might be some good reasons to derive from > this ideal situation. I

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tomás, On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:42:19PM +0100, Tomás Di Domenico wrote: > > > > Ideally, the documentation should be rebuilt from source. > > Right, things get a bit blurry for me here. When upstream releases a new > version, they take a snapshot from their repository and build the > releas

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 15, 2012, at 03:49 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: >On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Tomás Di Domenico wrote: >> Another blurry point. I'm having a hard time understanding the >> separation of tasks between the tarball packaging done by upstream I >> described before, and my Debian packaging.

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-14 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Tomás Di Domenico wrote: > Another blurry point. I'm having a hard time understanding the > separation of tasks between the tarball packaging done by upstream I > described before, and my Debian packaging. Similar to the docs, the > tests are run by upstream when t

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-14 Thread Tomás Di Domenico
On 13/11/12 21:17, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Tomás Di Domenico , 2012-11-12, 15:34: >> * Rebuilt the package with an upstream release tarball > > Much better now. :) > >> * Changed debian/* license to MIT, matching upstream's > > DEP-5-compliant short license name for the MIT license is "Expat". >

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Tomás Di Domenico , 2012-11-12, 15:34: * Rebuilt the package with an upstream release tarball Much better now. :) * Changed debian/* license to MIT, matching upstream's DEP-5-compliant short license name for the MIT license is "Expat". You don't have to repeat the license text twice; you

Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-12 Thread Tomás Di Domenico
Greetings, all. After the very helpful replies I received to my first message about packaging the CSB library, I'm now kindly requesting a second round of comments on the state of the package. With the goal of having a clean repo to start with, but also willingly repeating some steps to better un

Re: Second round of advise on packaging python-csb

2012-11-12 Thread Tomás Di Domenico
I clumsily forgot to post a reference to the package repository [1] in my previous message. My apologies. Tomás [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/python-csb.git;a=summary On 12/11/12 15:34, Tomás Di Domenico wrote: > Greetings, all. > > After the very helpful replies I received