I clumsily forgot to post a reference to the package repository [1] in my previous message. My apologies.
Tomás [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/python-csb.git;a=summary On 12/11/12 15:34, Tomás Di Domenico wrote: > Greetings, all. > > After the very helpful replies I received to my first message about > packaging the CSB library, I'm now kindly requesting a second round of > comments on the state of the package. > > With the goal of having a clean repo to start with, but also willingly > repeating some steps to better understand and learn them, I have > recreated the git repository for the package. A consequence of this is > that you will not be able to use the logs to see the changes since my > first message, so here's a list of the things I did: > > * Rebuilt the package with an upstream release tarball > * Added 'X-Python-Version: >= 2.6' to debian/control > * Versioned the build-dependency on python-all ( >> = 2.6.6-3~) > * Bumped the standard to 3.9.4 > * Bumped debhelper to 8.1.0 > * Changed debian/* license to MIT, matching upstream's > * Added dependency on ${python:Depends} > * Removed the empty docs file > > Speaking of docs, the upstream tarball contains HTML-formatted > documentation for the module's API. How would this be handled? Should it > be made available as a separate package? > > Once again, thank you all in advance. > > Tomás -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50a109ac.2000...@tdido.com.ar
