Re: libwxgtk2.2-python (fwd)

2001-10-17 Thread David M. Cooke
At some point, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++), > > I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this: > > > assuming there aren't any critical bugs. > > is one of the questions I want an anwser to here. > > Personally I've neve

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python (fwd)

2001-10-17 Thread Ron
> I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++), I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this: > assuming there aren't any critical bugs. is one of the questions I want an anwser to here. Personally I've never even installed python2.1 so I have no idea about it's stability

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python

2001-10-16 Thread Brendan J Simon
Matthias Klose wrote: Ron writes: On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote: If you think that two separate wxgtk versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing packages for a new version. Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python

2001-10-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Ron writes: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote: > > If you think that two separate wxgtk > > versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing > > packages for a new version. > > Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will > n

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python

2001-10-16 Thread Ron
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote: > If you think that two separate wxgtk > versions are really necessary please speak now because Ron is preparing > packages for a new version. Just to be completely clear about this, I almost certainly will not consider having *both*