On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:33 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I was hard to convince, but now I am: let's remove those 4 from testing. In
> order to allow Squeeze users to use PySide, I will probably handle backports.
> In
> the meantime, new upstream versions will land in unstable.
>
> This
Le lundi 11 octobre 2010 20:40:03 Adam D. Barratt, vous avez écrit :
> To be honest, I'm inclined to agree with Julien here, at least in terms
> of not being keen on the idea of importing the chain from experimental
> to testing at this point.
>
> The fact that those packages are already an upstre
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 10:46 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 21:49:33 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > So from here I see some options (with my opinion in parentheses)
> > i) Removing PySide from Squeeze
> > (I think it would be sad).
> > ii) Keeping the current PyS
Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 18:29:54 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, vous avez écrit :
> Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 10:46:24 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
> > I would rank them pretty much the opposite way. It seems to me that if
> > the bindings are still fast moving then whatever version we ship wil
Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 10:46:24 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 21:49:33 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > So from here I see some options (with my opinion in parentheses)
> > i) Removing PySide from Squeeze
> > (I think it would be sad).
> >
> > ii) Ke
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 21:49:33 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> So from here I see some options (with my opinion in parentheses)
> i) Removing PySide from Squeeze
> (I think it would be sad).
> ii) Keeping the current PySide in Squeeze and request the maintainer (me) to
> provide pa
6 matches
Mail list logo
