Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 18:29:54 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud, vous avez écrit :
> Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 10:46:24 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
> > I would rank them pretty much the opposite way. It seems to me that if
> > the bindings are still fast moving then whatever version we ship will be
> > too old when users for them appear.
>
> Okay. So you are leaving the responsability of the decision to me.
>
> NEW is basically a no-op these days, so it makes option iv) unrealist. I'd
> still be in favor of iii), which would fix the RC bugs while keeping a
> PySide version in Squeeze. Can I proceed?
>
> If no, I'll proceed with i), asking for the removal of the complete PySide
> B-D chain from Squeeze, although it'd be sad.
Hi dear Release Team,
it sounds as if we were stuck in some sort of communication blackhole: I don't
understand what more you do expect from me.
I already tried to express at best what sort of answer I am expecting from you,
but let me rephrase that:
What does the Release Team want:
a) an upload of the {apiextractor, generatorrunner, shiboken, pyside}
packages currently in experimental to unstable, aimed at
Squeeze (hence
needing unblocks later on);
b) a removal of {apiextractor, generatorrunner, shiboken, pyside}
packages
from Squeeze
?
As told, I am balanced between both options and would like you to pick one.
But as I asked for an upload permission, I will not upload new {a,g,s,p}
packages to unstable without an explicit permission from you; but I will
request
removals from testing if you want.
Please also tell me if I am doing something wrong with this request.
Cheers,
OdyX
--
Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM).
CH-1020 Renens
did...@raboud.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201010082033.08066.did...@raboud.com
