Thomas Goirand writes:
> FYI, I'm currently working on the package.
Thanks Thomas. I will reply off-list about these package-specific
questions.
--
\ “For man, as for flower and beast and bird, the supreme triumph |
`\ is to be most vividly, most perfectly alive” —D.H. Lawrence |
Scott Kitterman writes:
> The reason is that it simplifies moving to a new default
> python/python3 version and removing the old one.
Fair enough. That will need to be changed in the Debhelper and
Distribute tools for Python, though, as this package isn't doing
anything (AFAIK) to affect the def
On 10/10/2013 07:04 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Dmitry Shachnev writes:
>
>> In your particular case, python3-coverage depends on 'python3 (<<
>> 3.4), python3 (>= 3.3)', so when it is installed /usr/bin/python3 will
>> be always a link to python3.3, so the shebang doesn't matter here. But
>> in gene
Ben Finney wrote:
>Dmitry Shachnev writes:
>
>> In your particular case, python3-coverage depends on 'python3 (<<
>> 3.4), python3 (>= 3.3)', so when it is installed /usr/bin/python3
>will
>> be always a link to python3.3, so the shebang doesn't matter here.
>But
>> in general, I recommend peop
On Oct 10, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>I don't know the rationale for that dichotomy – only ‘/usr/bin/python’
>or ‘/usr/bin/pythonX.Y’ – but I also don't know why you recommend
>against it. What is your reason for wanting that policy changed?
It doesn't make sense to me to recommend /us
5 matches
Mail list logo
