On Oct 10, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Ben Finney wrote: >I don't know the rationale for that dichotomy – only ‘/usr/bin/python’ >or ‘/usr/bin/pythonX.Y’ – but I also don't know why you recommend >against it. What is your reason for wanting that policy changed?
It doesn't make sense to me to recommend /usr/bin/python and not allow /usr/bin/python3. "/usr/bin/python" is today's way of specifying a generic Python 2 interpreter, so why should the way to spell a generic Python 3 interpreter also be allowed? -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131010090242.39df140b@anarchist
