Hi.
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Olivier Berger , 2014-01-29, 10:25:
>>>Yeah, timeoutsocket.py looks like something that should have died a
>>>decade ago. In Python ≥ 2.3 you can set default timeout or a
>>>per-socket timeout without help of this library.
>>>
>>>planet-venus, python-feedvalidator an
* Olivier Berger , 2014-01-29, 10:25:
Yeah, timeoutsocket.py looks like something that should have died a
decade ago. In Python ≥ 2.3 you can set default timeout or a
per-socket timeout without help of this library.
planet-venus, python-feedvalidator and rawdog already use the proper
Python i
Hi.
Thanks for your responses.
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Olivier Berger , 2014-01-28, 16:39:
>>A quick search on http://codesearch.debian.net reports many hits for
>>the timeoutsocket.py library.
>>
>>I think it would be better to have a distinct package, then (hence a
>>RFP: #736935).
>>
>>Howe
Olivier Berger writes:
> I'm tempted to think that it may even no longer be needed at all,
It's only needed for Python 2.2 and earlier; it should be quite safe to
replace with the built-in equivalents on any modern version of
Python. (You may find that programs aren't using it anyway if they spo
* Olivier Berger , 2014-01-28, 16:39:
A quick search on http://codesearch.debian.net reports many hits for
the timeoutsocket.py library.
I think it would be better to have a distinct package, then (hence a
RFP: #736935).
However I don't have a clue whether this is really used by these
packa
5 matches
Mail list logo
