* Olivier Berger <olivier.ber...@telecom-sudparis.eu>, 2014-01-28, 16:39:
A quick search on http://codesearch.debian.net reports many hits for
the timeoutsocket.py library.
I think it would be better to have a distinct package, then (hence a
RFP: #736935).
However I don't have a clue whether this is really used by these
packages, if multiple versions co-exist, etc. I haven't played with
sockets in Python yet.
I'm tempted to think that it may even no longer be needed at all,
judging from http://bugs.python.org/issue555085 if the feature was
added to Python's standard library.
Yeah, timeoutsocket.py looks like something that should have died a
decade ago. In Python ≥ 2.3 you can set default timeout or a per-socket
timeout without help of this library.
planet-venus, python-feedvalidator and rawdog already use the proper
Python interfaces, and only fall back to timeoutsocket when they are not
available:
http://sources.debian.net/src/python-feedvalidator/0~svn1022-2/feedvalidator/__init__.py#L8
http://sources.debian.net/src/planet-venus/0~git9de2109-1/planet/spider.py#L378
http://sources.debian.net/src/rawdog/2.13.dfsg.1-1/rawdoglib/feedparser.py#L103
plucker and spikeproxy would have to be ported to the “new” API.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140128175053.ga5...@jwilk.net
