Is the empty message meant to say that python2.6 has no future in
Debian? :-)
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Jacques Brassé wrote:
>
>
--
$ python
>>> type(type(type))
My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine al
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1339914916.2170.0.ca...@nn.fritz.box
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:56:36AM +0100, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 6 June 2012 11:51, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Since some time, it's Plone
> > 4.[01] that requires Python 2.6. Only the still-in-beta Plone 4.2
> > even works with Python 2.7 (but 2.6 is still supported).
>
> For my own inter
On 6 June 2012 11:51, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Since some time, it's Plone
> 4.[01] that requires Python 2.6. Only the still-in-beta Plone 4.2
> even works with Python 2.7 (but 2.6 is still supported).
For my own interest, what does the current version do that prevents it
from working on 2.7? I
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:27:39AM +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Toni Mueller writes:
> >> +1. Time to retire Python 2.6. From Bernd's reply it sounds like
> >> the Zope upgrade needn't block this.
> >
> > please DON'T!
> >
> > I am a heavy Zope user, and, as others stated already
Hello,
Toni Mueller writes:
>> +1. Time to retire Python 2.6. From Bernd's reply it sounds like
>> the Zope upgrade needn't block this.
>
> please DON'T!
>
> I am a heavy Zope user, and, as others stated already, the Debian
> packages for Zope are useless. Sorry to say it that way,
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:28:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> You can make and then support a private repo with python2.6 based on the
> last Debian release.
yes, I can. :/
I actually did something like this to get 2.6 in Lenny.
> If you expect official Debian support (including se
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:21:37AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > >After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
> > >whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able
> > >to
> > >get rid of python2.6 in time for the release (I'd likely be able t
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:43:23PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 04, 2012, at 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> >After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
> >whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able to
> >get rid of python2
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2012-01-08, 22:53:
The ${python:Depends} is fine, but ${shlibs:Depends} generates
dependencies on libpython that are superfluous, as well as the
necessary libslang, libnewt dependencies. I _could_ drop the
${shlibs:Depends} and replace it with just 'libnewt0.52', (the libc
[Alastair McKinstry, 2012-01-08]
> The ${python:Depends} is fine, but ${shlibs:Depends} generates
> dependencies on libpython that are superfluous,
> as well as the necessary libslang, libnewt dependencies. I _could_ drop
> the ${shlibs:Depends} and replace it with
> just 'libnewt0.52', (the libc a
per that I don't need libpython*.
Any ideas?
please CC: me in any response as I'm not currently subscribed to
debian-python
regards
Alastair McKinstry
Original Message
Subject: (forw) Re: Future of python2.6 in Debian (python-newt)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 20
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> JFYI:
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > see
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org,
> > the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2
> > packagers is
> > outst
Hi,
JFYI:
Matthias Klose wrote:
> see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org,
> the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2 packagers
> is
> outstanding.
There's one issue which is not listed there but in
Hi,
I am sponsor of ordereddict package.
> On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which
>> is a
>> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock
>> python2.7.
>
> please reject it for now.
>
> After switching py
On Jan 04, 2012, at 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
>whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able to
>get rid of python2.6 in time for the release (I'd likely be able to act as a
>driver for the
although that might indeed be a trend
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=zope-common
but there remain quite a few users (popcon of zope-common is 266) using zope
through Debian packages
so may be it is too early to "retire" Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team...
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 01/04/2012 02:26 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
>> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
>
> please reject it for now.
Why? It could still be r
On 01/04/2012 01:58 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was pointed at ordereddict package in the NEW queue, which is a
> backport of OrderedDict object, also available in stock python2.7.
please reject it for now.
> After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we
> discussed whe
19 matches
Mail list logo
